So the Assembly that year passed S-3050, limiting the increases in the taxes a city or town can collect year over year to 5.5%, then 5% and marching down to 4%. Amazing, no? You wonder why no one thought of this before.
The newspaperman and essayist H. L. Mencken once wrote, in an essay about inspiration, "There is always a well-known solution to every human problem -- neat, plausible, and wrong." And of course, the reason no one thought of simple tax limits before is it's a horrible idea.
This is an impressive figure, but a bit less so when you consider that not a dime of it has gone to create new capacity.
This isn't just a commercial plug; it's a serious story about agriculture. There are many fewer farms in our state than there used to be, and some of us think that's a problem deserving more attention than it gets. The way our towns levy taxes is putting farms out of business. As a farm, an acre of land is worth much less than it is as a house lot. Lots of towns have agricultural zoning, but few tax agricultural land at anything less than the value it would have if divided up into house lots.
The predictable result is the steady loss of farms in the state. Since World War II, we've lost about 80% of the land we had in agriculture, and most of it has been built on.
As the 40th anniversary of the 1968 Olympics approaches, I’ve run into a few histories of the ‘ Black Power Salute,’ the Olympic Project for Human Rights, and the threatened boycotts of the event by many African American athletes.
Not well known about that iconic photo over on the right — of the medalists in the 200 meters, with Tommie Smith and John Carlos saluting — is the role that was played in its crafting by the silver medalist, Peter Norman of Australia.
As intro to his bad ass-ness, know that Australia blocked Norman from participating in the 1972 Olympics — despite his qualifying time — and that when Norman died a couple of years ago, Smith and Carlos were pall-bearers at his funeral.
Here’s a piece by Dave Zirin, written about Norman upon his passing:
Less noticed is the silver medalist. He is hardly mentioned in official retrospectives, and people assume him to be a Forrest Gump-type figure, just another of those unwitting witnesses to history who always end up in the back of famous frames. Only the perceptive notice that this seemingly anonymous individual is wearing a rather large button emblazoned with the letters O-P-H-R, standing for the Olympic Project for Human Rights.
The backlash endured by Smith and Carlos is well documented. Less known are Norman’s own travails. He was a pariah in the Australian Olympic world, despite being a five-time national champion in the 200 meters. He desired to coach the highest levels, yet worked as a Physical Education teacher, the victim of a down under blacklist.
As John Carlos said, “At least me and Tommie had each other when we came home. When Peter went home, he had to deal with a nation by himself. He never wavered, never denied that he was up there with us for a purpose and he never said ‘I’m sorry’ for his involvement. That’s indicative of who the man was.”
And, perhaps most telling, was this scene:
Norman never strayed from a life of humility. When a sculpture was unveiled of Smith and Carlos last year in California, Norman was left off, the silver medal platform purposely vacant so others could stand in his place. Smith and Carlos protested it, feeling it fed the false idea of Norman as political bystander. But Norman himself who traveled from Australia to California for the unveiling said, “I love that idea. Anybody can get up there and stand up for something they believe in. I guess that just about says it all.”
Anyway, there’s a new documentary opening about Peter Norman, his athletic career, and his involvement in the civil rights movement. Salute ’s just in Australia for now, but might make its way to the States too.
Captain Obvious here, reporting from “The Wall Street Journal Sunday” section lifted, I mean, reprinted in today’s Sunday Journal (which I can't seem to find online. p. F6). What is apparent to your intrepid blogger is that the bougie concept of what a contract is is as much of a problem for organized labor as anything else. Case in point: Jeff Opdyke’s Love & Money column titled “Bad Behavior? What does the contract say?” Mr. Opdyke gives us a concept of parenting by discipline where the disciplinee, the child, knows the measure of her/his discipline in advance because it is written down in a “contract.”
Dear little Johnny or Janey, allow me to introduce you to the concept of “collective bargaining.” What a contract really is is two or more sides agreeing on a code of rules that are equally applicable to everyone who signs the contract. What Mr. Opdyke is describing isn’t a contract so much as a “pay-for-performance” agreement. If you do A, you will get B, if you do not get A, you will not get B. There is not measurement of compliance mechanism other than the opinion of one party, (the parent in this case). There is no dispute resolution process, and there is no reciprocity of compliance on the dominant party. OK, that last part sounds kind of wonky – it means that all the power rests in the hands of one party and if they do not hold up their end of the bargain, there is nothing the other side can do about it.
This immature way of thinking about what a contract is is what is at the heart of our “September Problem” here in Rhode Island. Despite the arguments of now discredited groups like the Education Partnership, the power balance at the bargaining table is clearly with the employer between school committees and teacher unions; chiefly because of the lack of any reciprocity of compliance in upholding either the terms of the contract of the law itself. Teachers have no way to compel the employer live by the contracts or the law because there is no terminus of dispute. Teachers' right to strike is severely limited by the courts, often forcing teachers back under old terms within hours or at most days; there is no right to binding arbitration to allow unresolved issues to be decided by a uninvolved neutral (cops and firefights have it, wonder why…..) . On the other hand, if teachers do not uphold the agreements, there is court action, job discipline, certification issues, and in some cases, they are sent to bed without dinner!
If this bougie concept is what is being passed off as a “contract” then no wonder why employers get all out of sorts when one party, be they the child in Opdyke’s example or the worker in the union setting, demands, DEMANDS, that the parent/employer actually live up to its obligation under an agreement. Don’t you know who I am? I’m your mother, damn it……
Find CEO salary data at the New York Times, while the hedge fund data came courtesy Alpha, a hedge fund trade magazine.
Not quite sure whereto just yet, but she looks to be hurricane, and making contact with the east coast, in a week or so:
Get ready to OD on cuteness !
The Providence Animal Rescue League just put up a flickr page where people who adopted from the shelter can post success stories and pictures of animals they’ve adopted. The totally freaking adorable fellow to the right is Cappy, who’s currently living it up with a new owner in Hartford.
If you’ve adopted a pet from the Rescue League in the past and have some pictures to share, send them on over to adopt@parl.org with a story about how your pet’s doing.
The fiscal 2009 budget has now been approved by the Assembly, and everyone expects the Governor to sign it. Here are a dozen things worth knowing about it.
For example, I would very much like to live in a world where my government was more efficient. Wouldn't you? I wouldn't mind lower taxes, but even more I'd prefer a government that could provide some of the services friends of mine who live elsewhere get from their governments. In Virginia, a friend who left here recently reports that there is an extensive network of community swimming pools, with youth teams that train and compete in them all summer. In Portland, Oregon, a fabulous and cheap light rail system whisks people in and out of downtown, creating new and prosperous business districts around its stations. Further afield, in most of Europe, college tuition is free or negligible, and a student's choice of university to attend is limited only by his or her grades. And of course, in most of the rest of the world, health care is paid for either by the government or a state-run insurance pool
Ok, I live near a beach, so I can do without the swimming pools, but transportation, college tuitions and health care are three of the biggest expenses my family faces. (Well, the tuitions won't hit us for a couple more years, but it's near enough to begin to scare me.) In other places, government helps families with those expenses. Why not here?
From Rinku Sen, RaceWire:
On last night’s broadcast, a repeat from June 16, Colbert did the kind of thing that I almost never rely on white media figures to do. He was interviewing Kenneth Miller, who wrote a book about how the proponents of “intelligent design” are trying to teach creationism at schools. At one point, Miller compared creationists to women who fraudulently collect welfare checks, saying they’re asking for a government handout, “I would compare them to welfare queens,” he said.
… but come this fall, this is what you’ll be wanting. The New York Times headline writer tags this report, without any apparent irony, ‘In Milan, All Masculinity, No Pretense’.